Visaka Hariji :
‘Guruvayur Appan ‘, Dec 26, Thyagabrahma Gana Sabha, Chennai
She used be called Visaka Hari, now
Hariji . I wonder if her husband has become more venerated or she herself!
She has an attractive stage
presence –smartly attired, traditional looks, pleasant - but it does not distract. Her voice is rich
and when she speaks it is well modulated. Clear and good pronunciation. Her language skills are excellent– Sanskrit,
Tamil , English and Hindi. Seems to understand Telugu and Kannada.
Brilliant brand building – educated, musically trained ( ‘ A ‘ Grade artist of AIR ) ,devoted wife,
mother, family person respecting tradition, Father – in – law ‘Anna ‘ as mentor, philosopher, guide –
perfectly acceptable or even aspirational for her audience.
The hall is nearly full. Discourse
starts promptly at 6: 30 pm with Violin, Mrudangam and Ghatam and Tambura as in a regular music concert. It
starts off with some songs in praise of Krishna and then Guruvayur Appan. Krishna’s birth, his childhood, deeds etc. are sung well. By now she has traversed lands
all over India – Sri Rangam, Udipi, Srirangapattina, Dwaraka, Ayodhya, Mathura
… and covered in a broad sweep Chaitanya, Tukaram, Nandanars, Purandara Dasa,
Meera … Guruvayur Appan is not yet introduced.
Sthala mahatme begins and it is
more than one hour since she began. She compares many places of worship of Lord
Krishna. Light heartedly remarks how Guuvayur Krishna wakes up at 2 or 3 am where
as the one in Melukote near Bangalore is slow in getting up at 8 am ; perhaps it is cold weather, she adds.
Now on to an episode.
A devoted couple preparing to
celebrate the first anniversary of their only son. Description of the child -
clothes he wore, ornaments, preparations etc. follow. Due to negligence or
accident the child dies under tragic circumstances. She describes it well . Sleeping
child buried under discarded old wet clothes. Audience react in unison ‘ Ayyo ‘.
Some wet eyes and many sobs.
‘ Krishna Krishna Mukunda Murahare ‘ follows. Sings really
well and with great feeling. It touches the heart. The story is only a peg ;
you could supply your own version of the story or any other story for that
matter and absorb the sentiment into it.
Father goes out to temple and is lost in prayers to the
Lord.
A pause in the story as Visaka branches off to stress
another philosophic point ,ever popular with us. She talks about permanence or transience
of things. ‘ Nitya ‘ and ‘ Anitya ‘; and
‘Maya’. I think people are not comfortable but nod their heads wisely. But they wait and would like to know what
happened or (as they already know) how it happened and want to hear from her again.
They want simpler solutions. ‘ Maya’ can wait.
Now a lighter moment.
She mixes languages effectively – for example, in this
case Sanskrit and Tamil - How one may be born from Nara (ನರ
; man ) in
last birth to Naari (ನಾರಿ ; women ) in the present birth and
from Naari to Nari (ನರಿ ; fox ) in the next. Audience laugh but nervously wait to know the
fate of the devotee. Suspense continues.
She makes a philosophic point. Mind is like a mirror. It
reflects (gets filled) what is in front of it. Colours change, shapes change
etc. If it is filled with anger, lust etc. that is what one gets and suffers.
When it gets cleansed by Krishna consciousness then it becomes pure and filled
with joy.
Now she comes back to the main story and connects it. Lord appears as a child in devotee’s arms
because the devotee intensely desires it.
There is a collective sigh of relief and exclamation of wonder. A song flows freely
about the wonder called Krishna. She has her poetic moment. She raises the
story to an abstract level or rather makes it universal by saying how we see
Krishna every day. I thoroughly enjoy it.
Devotee says in a voice of surrender and fulfillment how
fortunate that he is born in Bharat. She branches off. ‘Mera Bharat Mahan ‘,
she says. Why? Because it is a land of so many saints, seers, mahatmas,
warriors who fought for preserving our religion and culture (particularly Rajputs).
I wonder. Rajputs might have fought the then Muslim rulers but it was more of
survival. Moreover when they were not fighting them they were busy fighting
themselves. Her ‘Bharat’ is an imaginary one and does not include other
religions or regions. If I am a person from Sikkim I wonder .. Why will they
feel proud to be associated with this? However, people applaud in patriotic fervor.
She takes a jibe at Indians ‘dying’ to go to USA leaving our glorious land. Now
a section of the crowd applauds. Some because they believe, some because they
could not go and now find a respectable reason and some parents of NRI children
who would not return.
(I am reminded of a conversation between a Bengali and a non-Bengali.
Bengali proudly claimed how Bengal has been the land of so many reformers like
Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar, Aurobindo, and Tagore which other
regions of India can never boast of. The other man said it was because Bengal (being
so depraved) needed so many reformers! )
Story is on hold again. Music continues. Very soon, almost without
a clue, she gets into Tanam singing followed by a brief expansion of a raga and
a Pallavi with appropriate emotive phrases.
Guruvayur Appan waits. She now talks about an old lady, another
devotee, who was guided home one night
by the Lord assuming the form of a boy. She gives him a piece of her saree to
cover himself as his dress gets wet. He takes leave of her. Next day when the
temple gates open, behold - the deity is covered in a piece of old cloth given
by her on previous night. Audience responds enthusiastically as she
sings praising the Lord.
Now the release from climax. She cracks a joke about how an
elephant does not eat whole day on Ekadasi while there are many (like me!) of us who would gorge on food like an
elephant. She speaks of the elephant Keshava’s devotion and how till the last
breadth he serves Guruvayur Appan. And now he is commemorated by a statue (‘it
is there even today ‘as if Keshava is a true historical figure with no doubts whatsoever
about his existence )
Now we are ready for another episode. It goes on for some
time. It is nearly three hours of non - stop discourse. People are happy as she
sings a song followed by Mangalam. They are ready for the next concert. We
leave the hall reluctantly with smiles all around.
Now some more of general impressions.
She feels the pulse of the people
and establishes excellent connection with audience very quickly. She is an
excellent communicator . People hang on to her every word. Builds up tempo to a climax then brings down. The cycle repeats. Makes it participatory.
Her discourse is an amalgamation of
drama, music, story, philosophy, devotion. There is free flow – effortless
transitions from one to another.
She has created this unique
combination. While Harikatha has existed for long she has made it beautiful, vibrant and
glamorous
Excellent story teller – holds
suspense, meanders at the right time making her audience wait and wonder ‘what
happens next’ and then she is back.
Gamakas are many – Sphruta , slides, murchana,
kampita etc. Likewise she has pun, irony, satire, and she chides, jabs, exaggerates, dramatizes ( Henry
James, once said, ‘ Dramatise’ ‘
Dramatise ‘ ), appeals emotionally , uses melodrama sparingly, dishes out wise
cracks, homilies, talks as if she is next door neighbor come for a chat, visualizes,
paints as it were through words, ‘ pesum
chittirame ‘.
Her advantage is that she can use
any thing that is popular. If ‘ Kaliyugadali .. ‘ ‘ Kurai onrum .. ‘‘ Vaishnava
janato ‘ have been sung well and made popular by others she can and
does put to use immediately and effectively.
I believe she is still
evolving this form. Balance between music and recitation of story.
She has to find new episodes
constantly. As of now she does good research, composes or selects songs,
creates a framework, takes up wise sayings of ‘Anna ‘or someone else. But she has to be creative all the time.
Entry barrier is high for others.
Her audience by and large are the
people who are interested in classical music. Brahmins in general. Her
utterings ( sayings of ‘Anna’ ) like for example, the importance of ‘ Sandya
vandane ‘ would not interest non Brahmins; let alone other communities. She has
to find a way to make it more secular but retaining moral tones so as to retain
the present set and attract others. How to make it appealing to non – Brahmins
(non – Hindus)?
Language: While she is proficient
in Sanskrit, Tamil, English , Hindi and can understand Telugu and Kannada ,
her discourse is in Tamil – English
combination. This limits her audience although songs in Telugu (Carnatic Music)
and Kannada would draw others to some extent. How to reach out beyond Tamils?
Some jarring notes though.
She mouths Imbecile Philosophy sometimes. I feel it is an
insult to our intelligence. Makes incredulous
statements (Rama and Krishna lived millions of years back. Vedas are sooo
ancient; NASA has proved it- I do not what)
Showing disrespect or complete ignorance about Knowledge. A
saint’s or mahatma’s knowledge supersedes all others. All knowledge can be
attained by such mahatmas. Then what happens to our poor scholars in Art and Science
I wonder. It is a pity that these are pitted one against the other for which
there is no need. Ignorance of say science, arts etc. is understandable but
there is nothing to appreciate in it. Playing to the gallery perhaps? People
hiding their ignorance in a veneer of spirituality.
Mature, consistent philosophy or
framework needed and not ad hoc and changing ones depending on the needs. Have
humility / ability to acknowledge cultural diversity and the fact that Brahmanism
is not central to the world! I ardently hope she sticks to common sense.
Should approach miracles etc. in a poetic way ; as metaphors rather than
literal truths. If she does it can become beautiful and thought provoking.
She has the right to expect from her
audience ‘suspension of disbelief ‘(as long as a writer could infuse a "human
interest and a semblance of truth" into a fantastic tale as poet
and aesthetic philosopher Coleridge
suggested) it should not be juvenile. She
does well sometimes but goes overboard carried away by her enthusiasm and
perhaps goaded by sayings of ‘Anna ’.
Why do I like her?
Sheer joy of story telling /
listening. It incorporates music and talk, drama and feelings. It is magical at
her best. When she does well ‘a terrible beauty is born’ as Yeats says. At that
moment the particular incident disappears (for me) and I appreciate in a state
of ‘suspension of disbelief ‘and often substitute my own story. When she extracts an abstraction from some
examples I do my own if I not in agreement with her. To give her credit she
does well most of the time. So amongst believers I sit and enjoy and often
relate to what she is saying. These are ‘musical truths’ and ‘literary truths ‘and
are colored by me to suit my taste.
But to end with what happened:
As we leave, one lady remarks rather seriously that she
feels like to going on a trip to Guruvayur as soon as possible. Visaka Hari has
successfully sold Guruvayur to her fans ! Marketing at its best.